Thank you. I went the multicast way just because it seemed easier to setup and I could just send the info out to all the boxes. If I switch to unicast, does that mean I have to redefine everything in xlights and the f16 as well as re-assign the LOR boxes I have?
Last year, everything worked great with no delay at all. This year, overall I replaced 4 LOR 16 channel boxes and two CCR's with a total of 4152 pixel nodes (a mix of WS2811 and INK 1003). One interesting thing is that when I tested the pixel megatree and arches I added this year earlier in my basement before setting them up outside, there was no lag at all. Wouldn't the same amount of data have been getting pushed out? I had one of my 396 pixel frequency signs, the 2160 pixel megatree and 4 150 node arches all running during testing in the basement with no delay. I just can't seem to come to grips with this lag. Its basically where if there is an arch chase, it will skip certain pixels and resume "down the line" .
When I checked the laptop just now with the show running, it's only using 4% of the 2.3Ghz processor, 51% of 4GB ram, 1% of the GPU and the ethernet showed sending at 3.7 Mbps. IPv4 showed the address of the F16 and IPv6 showed some address I didn't know.
I'm just worried about the involvement of switching over to unicast since after reading all the potential problems people had with it, I initially went with a multicast setup. If this seems to be the overall problem, then I guess I'm left with no other option. Thanks again for all your help. IF I did the pi to run it, is it as simple as replacing the PC with the Pi and the FPP software? Would that let me still just run one cat 5 out to the f16 and then from there daisy chain my LOR like now and use the expansion cards?