First I don't want anyone to get the wrong idea. I think V4 is absolutely where this software needs to go, and I am speaking from a user stand point not a programmer standpoint.
The software is still in Beta and I keep telling myself that.
Beat is the wrong word it is not a contest. And the only reason for the comparison is because when I run this particular sequence in version 3 it is to me complete. It is what I envisioned while was using the tools to make the effects I had in my mind. Then when I run the sequence in v4 things are missing and these are probably just Beta tweaks. But once the v4 is complete I would hope that you could not see any difference in the sequence if run in v3 or in v4.
Generally in my (opinion) any software ie: cad, photo, word processor. The new version should be backwards compatible and allow you to open the previous version file and have it look just as it did in the prior version and I would bet that Sean, Gil, Dan and all of the programmers are striving to accomplish this.
There are so many ++++ with V4, Timing marks flexibility, importing many forms of sequence data especially LOR and Super Star files, Visualization of models and whole house. The list keeps getting longer.
I, Me, Brad, had just got pretty good at using some of the tools available in V3 and I have not spent the 1000 hours in V4 like I had in V3 using the tools. So I am in the learning curve and it becomes frustrating when I see some of the info I did in V3 not show up V4.
Because of my "work load" I am still on the fence for the next 3 weeks before I have to comment to V4 or stick with V3 for this year. I will not have the time to fix the little things in V3 sequences and create 9 new sequences for this year. Along with dealing with the things life tends to throw at us.
Hope this helps.
Mr. Gilrock I will now open the same sequence in V3 and V4 so I can maybe give you the information you need to point you in the correct direction.
Brad