Timings were derived via Audacity Onset Detector. No doubt I would have manually created them differently. I suppose I would prefer to have a lot of different "interesting" sequences than just a few beautiful ones.
I still have a huge body of work to do to be ready for Christmas so I am furiously sequencing as I generally like have around 18 hours of different music. The addition of RGB and Nutcracker this year only adds to the joyful burden.
Using this method of sequencing (using Audacity timings) for Nutcracker and SS I can create almost one/two sequences per day. They are not beautiful or especially artistic but as was said, "interesting". When I use the same timings to create a sequence in SS that sequence includes my 96ch of led lights and the newly added 500+ rgb pixels. I can then take the led effects from SS and add to the RGB effects from Nutcracker. The sequences then becomes either a "ss" sequence or an "xl+ss" sequence in my nomenclature for naming the sequences. Two sequences, same timings, 2 different sets of RGB effects.
I am still learning and hopefully getting better. Some timings are too "tight" and have to be purposely loosened up. Some are too loose and must have additional timings added manually. Just learned how to manually edit my timings and add notes on the audacity side before exporting to Nutcracker
Always willing to share.
